"from June 24, the day of the U.S. Supreme Court decision, to July 11, 2022. The 10-year-old victim is among seven patients younger than 18 who received abortion care in Indiana during the time period."
The ten year old was the only one of those listed pregnancy was result of abuse.
Recently some anti wrote in comments on a Roe v Wade article, that only 1% of rapes result in pregnancy. Quick Google search shows: "The national rape-related pregnancy rate is 5.0% per rape among victims of reproductive age (aged 12 to 45); among adult women an estimated 32,101 pregnancies result from rape each year."
Thus the anti's data was incorrect. So what if the child's rape resulted in pregnancy, he thinks, none of those raped female's pregnancies should qualify them for doctor assisted termination of pregnancy. Wonder what the person would say if those 32,101 rapists were castrated and/or made to provide financial aid starting at the moment of conception,
The raped pregnant females might not mind carrying their rapists' fetus to term, going through labor, often excruciating painful delivery to give birth to their baby. They might not mind raising the baby to adulthood.Others would find it horrifying ~ a constant reminder of the violence visited upon them.
Even if it were only 1%, the choice is always hers and hers alone, not some stranger living 3,000 miles away.
Dr. Caitlin Bernard being investigated
https://www.indystar.com/story/news/health/2022/07/14/ohio-abortion-10-year-old-indiana-todd-rokita-dr-caitlin-bernard/65373626007/
